Abstracts written by ChatGPT, even scientists cannot distinguish

## My Thoughts - You cannot go against human nature. - If research institutes do not ban AI-generated papers, scientists will be tempted. - A British AI thought leader and author Nina Schick believes that by 2025 more than 90% of Internet content will be created by AI, and I agree. It's just a matter of time. - I expect the market for tools or services to determine AI production will grow in the future. ## Summary - Papers created by chatbots, even scientists cannot distinguish - Paper abstracts written by ChatGPT pass 100% plagiarism check - AI creation inspection program catches 66% machine-written - Humans mistakenly judge 32% of chatbot-generated abstracts as real abstracts - There are cases of posting ChatGPT as a co-author in papers. - There are cases in which research institutes ban papers written with ChatGPT or other AI language tools. - If quantitative evaluation of papers continues, scientists may be tempted to increase the number of AI-generated abstracts or papers. - Irren Soleiman of AI company Hugging Face says, > These models are trained on past information and social and scientific progress can often come from thinking, or being open to thinking, differently from the past. ## References [Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00056-7) [90% of online content could be ‘generated by AI by 2025,’ expert says](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/90-of-online-content-could-be-generated-by-ai-by-2025-expert-says-201023872.html) ## Links [[_MOC_2_AI-Robotics]]